Articles containing the tag: false witness

Woman’s identity hijacked by federal agent

Published under Civil Rights

God's Law

Under the Law of God, false witnesses are punished by the same punishment they were trying to bring on the innocent person with their false witness (Deut. 19:15-21). There is no special exemption for government thugs in the Law. Therefore, in this case, the government thug Timothy Sinnigen would have been sentenced to exactly the same punishment as the innocent victim would be, with no parole. In addition, because slander against the reputation of an innocent person is considered of the same mag (cont.)
. . . . . .

Man's Law

Under the laws of men, an individual’s reputation is not considered of any value for the government thugs, and therefore can be used in any way as they see fit, to destroy or tarnish. Also, false accusations, when made by government thugs, are never punished. Government thugs are allowed to inflict any kind of moral, psychological, or physical harm to private individuals without any option for recourse or justice.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Campus on lockdown for carrying an umbrella

Published under Civil Rights

God's Law

Under the Law of God, there is no standing army of trigger-happy, uniformed thugs, who have special legal rights to harass innocent people for any possible suspicion or imagination. The government gets involved only when a real crime has been committed and witnesses are brought in to testify. The safety of the society is left to the self-control and the vigilance of free men, armed to protect their communities.

Man's Law

Under the laws of man, it is the individual, free, innocent person who is always the “threat” to society, and he is always subject to harassment by the government’s professional army of thugs who eventually take in their hands everything, including official theft and instant executions without trial or verdict. In the final account, there is nothing an individual can do that won’t get him in trouble with the “authorities,” if they decide he is a “possibl (cont.)
. . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .